@pro_chess_player123 said in #11:
> this is the best opening to lose!!
> you should really try it in antichess
I can almost play anything and still win. Openings are openings. Ppl know openings in general because of patterns. Ppl compare moves with stockfish or computers..forget computers because we are humans. Chess is not all about to find and play the best moves all the time, its much all about example psychology...I have played many shit moves/openings. You can play chess in different ways - positionally, gambit, by saqs, by bluffing, etc. Once i played against female titled...And i decided me before the game started to saq several pieces to try to deliver mate with queen saq, as a experiment. I did it. Thats why sometimes im playing unorthodox instead of orthodox and "boring chess".
I tried hippotameous once against a 2200 player or so, i won the match with 95% accuracy. And i havent even study or played it before. And often with that game i've illustrated i often have example 87% accuracy with it...I played it against a GM in simul and he couldnt beat me.
Once i experimented with new opening - Duras gambit. At first attemt i saqed 3 pawns in front of the king but i had the lines with bishops and queen. He got quickly mated. I bluffed, but he had move but didnt found it and played it.
I dondt care much about theory, i care more about practical play and intuicion.
I know a GM who have a signature move, in move one - 1. Knh3...see?