I beat level 8 in blitz
@Dmitri_Fatkin said in #99:
> I refuse to understand its 3. f3 & 5. Nh3?! Seems like we're in positional development misunderstanding! ;-)
Move 3, f3, is not a typical move in the Queen's Pawn Game, Modern Defense variation. The move f3 by White weakens the pawn structure and lacks a clear purpose in the opening. It also creates potential weaknesses in White's position, particularly around the e3 square, which could become a target for Black's pieces.
The suggested improvement according to the annotation is to play e4 instead of f3. Moving the e-pawn to e4 would establish a strong pawn center and exert more control over the central squares. It would also allow White to develop their pieces more efficiently and create potential threats against Black's position.
In summary, move 3, f3, is considered a slight inaccuracy because it does not contribute effectively to White's development or control of the center, as e4 would have done.
In move 5 of the game, White played Nh3, which is another inaccuracy according to the annotation provided by lichess.org. Let's examine this move and its implications:
d4 g6
c4 Bg7
f3?! c5
dxc5 Na6
Nh3?!
Move 5, Nh3, is a peculiar move that doesn't contribute much to White's development or control of the center. The knight on h3 is placed on the edge of the board and doesn't influence the central squares or participate in the battle for control of the board. It also blocks the h2 square, potentially hindering the development of the h1-rook.
The suggested improvement according to the annotation is to play e4 instead of Nh3. By advancing the e-pawn to e4, White would reinforce the central pawn on d4 and open lines for the pieces to develop more actively. This move would help White establish a strong central presence and put pressure on Black's position.
In summary, move 5, Nh3, is considered another inaccuracy because it fails to contribute effectively to White's development or control of the center, as e4 would have done.
> I refuse to understand its 3. f3 & 5. Nh3?! Seems like we're in positional development misunderstanding! ;-)
Move 3, f3, is not a typical move in the Queen's Pawn Game, Modern Defense variation. The move f3 by White weakens the pawn structure and lacks a clear purpose in the opening. It also creates potential weaknesses in White's position, particularly around the e3 square, which could become a target for Black's pieces.
The suggested improvement according to the annotation is to play e4 instead of f3. Moving the e-pawn to e4 would establish a strong pawn center and exert more control over the central squares. It would also allow White to develop their pieces more efficiently and create potential threats against Black's position.
In summary, move 3, f3, is considered a slight inaccuracy because it does not contribute effectively to White's development or control of the center, as e4 would have done.
In move 5 of the game, White played Nh3, which is another inaccuracy according to the annotation provided by lichess.org. Let's examine this move and its implications:
d4 g6
c4 Bg7
f3?! c5
dxc5 Na6
Nh3?!
Move 5, Nh3, is a peculiar move that doesn't contribute much to White's development or control of the center. The knight on h3 is placed on the edge of the board and doesn't influence the central squares or participate in the battle for control of the board. It also blocks the h2 square, potentially hindering the development of the h1-rook.
The suggested improvement according to the annotation is to play e4 instead of Nh3. By advancing the e-pawn to e4, White would reinforce the central pawn on d4 and open lines for the pieces to develop more actively. This move would help White establish a strong central presence and put pressure on Black's position.
In summary, move 5, Nh3, is considered another inaccuracy because it fails to contribute effectively to White's development or control of the center, as e4 would have done.
A well-measured outlook. ChatGPT has considerably improved its insight of the game in comparison with beginning of last year.
May be level 7 is weakened intentionally when playing with white, but I don't see strange moves when playing with black. Mass Exchange and pushing pawns episode 3
Finally found the fair play rules page. As usual with important documentation in lichess it is pretty well hidden, but google can find it.
lichess.org/page/fair-play
It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
lichess.org/page/fair-play
It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
Any (type of) game vs the Lichess AI, that's what the first condition implies.
The only restriction are automatically-made moves (to constrain server load).
The only restriction are automatically-made moves (to constrain server load).
@ProgrammerAngrim said in #105:
> Finally found the fair play rules page. As usual with important documentation in lichess it is pretty well hidden, but google can find it.
> lichess.org/page/fair-play
> It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
There are also offline games that can be played against Stockfish online on mobile app.
> Finally found the fair play rules page. As usual with important documentation in lichess it is pretty well hidden, but google can find it.
> lichess.org/page/fair-play
> It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
There are also offline games that can be played against Stockfish online on mobile app.
@ProgrammerAngrim said in #105:
> Finally found the fair play rules page. As usual with important documentation in lichess it is pretty well hidden, but google can find it.
> lichess.org/page/fair-play
> It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
Translated to algorithm if playing against lichess AI then yes else if playing rated or casual then no, what is the result?
> Finally found the fair play rules page. As usual with important documentation in lichess it is pretty well hidden, but google can find it.
> lichess.org/page/fair-play
> It actually seems a bit unclear, it says that for "Any game vs the Lichess AI" you can use assistance, but also that "Real-time game, rated or casual" you can not use assistance. I wonder if the rules were machine translated? My best guess though is that they mean that you can use assistance when playing around in the analysis board, and not in timed games vs stockfish.
Translated to algorithm if playing against lichess AI then yes else if playing rated or casual then no, what is the result?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.