@Gitananda said in #40:
> Of course it does. You said "So literally - 80% of the casualties could've been militants in this attack, and they would've reported it to you as 100% civilians." But since Israel (according to the U.S.) is bombing indiscriminately with 2000 lb. bombs and most of Gaza's population of over 2 million people are civilians then the majority of the casualties would *have* to be civilian.
Your premise and conclusion are both flawed.
That's not me taking a stance on the war-- it's just a response to the logical validity of your statement.
> Of course it does. You said "So literally - 80% of the casualties could've been militants in this attack, and they would've reported it to you as 100% civilians." But since Israel (according to the U.S.) is bombing indiscriminately with 2000 lb. bombs and most of Gaza's population of over 2 million people are civilians then the majority of the casualties would *have* to be civilian.
Your premise and conclusion are both flawed.
That's not me taking a stance on the war-- it's just a response to the logical validity of your statement.